The New York Times concludes that “The Obama administration needs to step up its efforts to aid the middle class — or the financial crisis will have no end in sight.” The Times proposes a two part solution to the foreclosure crisis; the first being economic stimulus to stem job losses, an argument that holds obvious merit. Their second proposal concludes that “Loan modification programs that reduce monthly payments may not be effective, because the bigger problem is negative equity.” They fault the administration for building a plan that centers on lower monthly mortgage payments while only recommending principle reductions instead of somehow making them mandatory. The Times also criticizes the administration’s anti-foreclosure plan which was recently gutted by the large banks and mortgage lenders.

The cure-all proposed by The New York Times appears to be focused on principle reductions across the board which would be steep enough to restore some equity to borrowers, giving them additional motivation to stay in their homes and allow them to borrow against their new-found equity should a hardship such as the loss of a job or illness occur.

By the end of the editorial, the Times is calling for home equity to be restored to homeowners, jobs to be added to the economy, and steady paychecks for all. How banks remain solvent, who pays for job stimulus, and how regular pay checks are covered in this grand plan is left for someone else to answer. The Times does get it half right in that it’s fixing the economy that will finally curb the foreclosure crisis. The big questions again are how and how much will it take?